IGA Istanbul Airport cuts 2024 emissions beyond forecasts, raises renewable energy target to 90% by 2030

On the capacity side, the plan envisions a growth of megawatts added through year-by-year procurement, with a projected shift toward a high-availability mix that reduces volatility. The trajectory shows an upward curve across quarters, enabling travel and service continuity during peak periods. Through disciplined procurement and research into storage economics, the hub can keep extra capacity kept in reserve, while rooms remain accessible for learn sessions with frontline staff.

Inclusive leadership drives results, with bilgen- and russell-led teams collaborating across rooms to discover practical savings. A medical readiness program protects staff during peak travel periods, while stronger safety and maintenance routines help stay online. To reverse stagnation and maintain momentum, the program keeps extra capacity in reserve and ensures knowledge sharing across research activities through regular reviews, while the governance framework oversees the execution, reporting toward a credible trajectory for a high megawatts share of low-carbon capacity and a stable travel experience.

IGA Istanbul Airport: 2024 Emissions Cut Beyond Forecasts and 90% Renewable Target by 2030

Prioritise accelerating the shift to low-carbon electricity by expanding on-site generation and long-term supply contracts; begin phased deployment of solar surfaces across terminal roofs and service areas, and scale storage to support operations across regions, including eskişehir connections, delivering a stronger carbon footprint reduction and a reliable power backbone for passenger flows.

Shown data indicate increased efficiency in processes and surfaces, with a well-connected grid and a fully operational dashboard to monitor coverage, detection, and controls. Government oversight and benchmarks with hartsfield-jackson illustrate how strong governance and phased milestones can keep performance on track, safe.

Operational gains include improved passenger experience, safer surfaces, and stronger resilience; the approach begins with addressing critical power needs, increasing green energy share, and includes eskişehir collaboration with regional partners. This practice supports higher reliability and better service delivery.

Over the longer term, governance alignment across regions will yield stronger results, with phased rollout of controls and detection mechanisms that expand coverage while keeping safety central. The facility keeps a connected infrastructure and uses a dashboard to show real-time status, enabling faster response actions by government and operators.

Supplier Collaboration and Governance Strategy for 90% Renewable Energy by 2030

Concrete recommendation: establish a rigorous, reinforcing governance charter with a cross-functional supplier base to accelerate the shift toward green power, anchored by a public, data-driven framework and a shared trajectory of progress.

• Governance framework and agreement
  • Form a Strategic Collaboration Council including procurement, operations, and external partners; draft a material agreement that defines scope, decision rights, cadence, and escalation paths; align incentives to prioritize long-term value creation.
  • Embed a development plan that targets top contributors first, and extend to additional suppliers over time, ensuring the trajectory remains within the risk tolerance and is supported by senior sponsorship at dinsdale and swedavia as reference exemplars.
  • Ensure governance processes are accessible to internal stakeholders and the public, reinforcing integrity and transparency throughout the lifecycle of contracts.
• Data, safeguarding and transparency
  • Create a central data model with standardized definitions and a live dashboard accessible to authorized parties, enabling real-time discovery of performance gaps and opportunities.
  • Institute safeguarding measures to protect data integrity and supplier confidentiality, while maintaining a public-level overview of progress and known risks.
  • Use forecasts to inform capacity planning and procurement timing, ensuring decisions are grounded in known trends and validated by real-world performance.
• Supplier development and collaboration
  • Launch joint pilots with key partners to validate practical approaches in transport and passenger operations; prioritise collaborations with high-consumption categories to maximize impact.
  • Develop capability-building programs for suppliers to reduce barriers to adoption, using a documented timeline and measurable milestones that reinforce continual improvement.
  • Integrate supplier feedback into product and service design, discovering material efficiencies that can be scaled across the network.
• Risk management and safeguarding
  • Identify known and emergent risks across markets, supply continuity, and regulatory changes; implement a risk register and mitigation plans with regular review times.
  • Establish contingency options and rescues for critical supply interruptions, ensuring care for both operational resilience and public expectations.
  • Limit exposure by diversifying supplier base and technology choices, while maintaining rigorous oversight of performance data and contract terms.
• Measurement, limits and consumption
  • Set material, time-bound consumption limits and track against them weekly; use an accessible scorecard to surface deviations early and enable proactive management.
  • Quantify savings opportunities with a transparent method and assign part ownership to relevant teams and suppliers to accelerate action.
  • Report progress in public summaries that highlight care for the environment, stakeholder well-being, and the social license to operate.
• Modeling, trajectory and verification
  • Use a robust model to project future power mix scenarios; continuously refine inputs through real-world data feeds and known performance results.
  • Validate model outputs with independent verifications and periodic audits to safeguard integrity and reinforce confidence among stakeholders.
  • Ensure iterative learning loops so the trajectory becomes increasingly accurate, turning insights into scalable actions across times and regions.
• Communication, alignment and conclusion
  • Publish periodic updates that describe outcomes, risk responses, and ongoing priorities; keep the public well-informed while safeguarding sensitive details.
  • Foster a culture of care and accountability, aligning supplier behavior with the organisation’s values and strategic goals, and concluding each phase with a clear action plan for the next.
  • Conclude with a proven, accessible path that links governance activities to measurable reductions in consumption and to resilience improvements across the transport network and its passenger experience.

What drove the 2024 emissions reduction vs. forecast?

Recommendation: lock in the pollution decline by accelerating on-site megawatts of generation, upgrading lines feeding terminals, and pushing targeted action across all zones to sustain the year’s performance without added risk.

Milestone achieved in publishing energy metrics reveals a clear separation between projections and actual pollutant output, validating the efficiency program’s early impact.

That outcome rests on sustained effort, resilience, and robust detection, with kamu and saggaf teams guiding connected systems to monitor performance in metres and megawatts terms.

Investment signals were clear: on-site generation, access to extra capacity, and cash-backed pilots in the terminals supported the advance, keeping power lines stable and accessible to critical loads; this approach also reduces risk and strengthens resilience.

Bilgi sharing across stakeholders enabled well-informed calculation of needs and an agreed benchmark, guiding the action plan and investment choices across zones, with measurable gains in efficiency and reliability.

This discipline keeps the operation well aligned with strategic needs.

Leading teams together will ensure ongoing improvements, detection of issues early, and a move toward a more connected, well-balanced system that will serve customers and boost capability in every terminal area.

New 90% renewable energy target by 2030: milestones and reporting cadence

Begin a continuous, annually published roadmap that defines performance against a rolling five-year plan, within global operations and diverse staff responsibilities. The response from relationships begins with leadership alignment and kamu involvement, ensuring supplier collaboration and transparent communication across functions.

Define yenilenebilir capacity and current supply boundaries within the mix, and set these milestones as cumulative kilowatt-hours delivered from clean sources. These includes on-site generation, power-purchase agreements, and grid-based options, with a defined increase path and a commitment to health and safety benefits for staff. Once baselined, publish progress to all stakeholders, creating a clear mapping of responsibilities and accountability.

Cadence and governance: the plan requires annual publishing of performance against the rolling plan, with cross-functional, continuous improvement loops. The approach is implemented by diverse teams and draws on lessons from global peers such as Budapest. These efforts deliver benefits in reliability, resilience, and staff well-being, while strengthening relationships and long-term commitment.

How supplier collaboration is structured: governance, contracts, and KPIs

Adopt a three-tier framework with a shared steering council, standardized contracts, and a KPI set anchored in real-world energy use and operational improvements. Lead roles by Adnan (procurement) and Raghunath (engineering) ensure interests from both sides are represented, while the terms prioritize security and integrity of data exchanges.

Governance layers include a Shared Steering Board that defines policy, risk appetite, and major changes; a bilateral contracts group that maintains term sheets and change-control rules; and dedicated project teams handling day-to-day actions. Establish a cadence of quarterly policy reviews, monthly operational checkpoints, and weekly issue triage, with a maintained decisions log to support reverse audits and traceability of actions.

Contracts deploy a bial framework–bilateral agreements with shared responsibilities, cross-cutting change-control, and clear data rights. Templates incorporate service expectations, data exchange protocols, and milestones tied to kilowatt-hours reporting. AkrylIk dashboards provide tamper-evident visibility into metrics and maintenance scheduling, reinforcing transparency and accountability.

KPIs concentrate on energy efficiency and reliability: kilowatt-hours per unit of throughput, energy-intensity improvements, maintenance cycle time, on-time deliveries, and security incident reductions. Track trends monthly, normalize results to real-world conditions, and define a common data dictionary to align definitions across airports. Establish performance thresholds within defined timescales to trigger corrective actions.

Data governance specifies protocols for data sharing, data quality, and data security. Maintain integrity through end-to-end audit trails, encryption at rest and in transit, and role-based access controls. Implement independent validation steps for critical data feeds to ensure accuracy and trust among all stakeholders, including suppliers and operators.

Investments are mapped to mutual interests, with a formal inclusivity agenda that opens opportunities for diverse suppliers. Link improvements to payments or incentive mechanisms and allocate budget lines for technology upgrades and training. Within the framework, offer onboarding support, digital tools, and continuous upskilling to broaden participation without compromising security or integrity.

Implementation steps begin with defining governance roles, finalizing contract templates, and building a KPI dictionary. Run a 90-day pilot with 4–6 suppliers to quantify kilowatt-hours impact, maintenance savings, and delivery reliability. Use the results to refine data pipelines, update protocols, and scale the model to additional partners while maintaining a steady cadence of reviews and improvements.

Real-world measurements feed general trends and inform improvements. Report quarterly metrics that show high-impact actions, such as actions that deliver the fastest ROI and the broadest coverage. Maintain momentum by revisiting investments, updating the bial agreement terms, and tracing progress against the established cadence and security requirements.

Risk management and compliance: ensuring supply chain decarbonization

Recommendation: Begin with a defined baseline for carbon intensity and roll out a three-phase program that begins now, with annually updated milestones. A visionary board should maintain clear governance, assign defined roles, and ensure accountability across supplier tiers, while engage cross-functional teams to accelerate alignment.

Implement a digital data architecture to surface patterns of risk across the chain, enabling actionable insights. They should engage suppliers early to increase transparency and resilience; the effort should be incremental and free from ambiguity, with data feeds that update annually and feed executive dashboards.

Adopt a holistic risk framework that defines categories, assesses supplier capability, and evaluates transport modalities. They should engage cross-functional teams, increase due diligence, and maintain documented policies; a dynamic governance dashboard surfaces governance signals and guides continuous improvement.

In supplier agreements, embed concise, auditable clauses that drive incremental improvements and ensure open reporting channels. This approach transcends compliance, creating openings for innovation across eskişehir-based partners and global peers while enabling faster decision-making.

Segment the chain into medical, industrial, and consumer categories; compared to baselines, supplier performance on carbon-intensity trajectories shows strong momentum. Use advanced analytics and digital twins to discover patterns, then translate into actionable milestones for the next phase. eskişehir-based manufacturers can become anchors, delivering innovative, resilient solutions that strengthen the holistic industry shift.

The program surfaces openings for cross-sector collaboration; maintain a virtuous cycle of data, governance, and learning. The framework is dynamic, well-supported by data, and enables faster decarbonization while reducing risk, helping the chain become more resilient and scalable over time.

Implementation backbone: data integration, monitoring, and verification mechanisms

Deployment of a single, scalable data backbone is recommended to strengthen visibility across facility operations, supplier inputs, and utility feeds. This deployment should feed a centralized ledger that supports faster year-over-year comparisons and clearer accountability for their decisions, with a focus on practical, verifiable gains.

• Data integration framework – create an advisory-led model that unifies SCADA outputs, building-management system signals, and electricity-load records from plant equipment to offsite partners. Use standard interfaces in networks that allow where data streams converge to be shown in real time. Include ppas data, contract schedules, and metering points to ensure verified inputs across year milestones.

• Holistic monitoring stack – implement a layered dashboard that highlights contamination risks, ambient conditions, and resource utilization. Schedule sessions with partnerships leads to review anomalies, calibrations, and corrective actions. Ensure the yüzeyi layer normalizes disparate data formats into a common unit system, enabling cross-site comparability.

• Verification and governance – establish a formal verification protocol with independent assessments at defined year intervals. Maintain tamper-evident logs, cryptographic seals, and third-party attestations to corroborate measurements and contamination controls. Leverage sangster–led reviews to validate methodology and report verified results to the community of stakeholders.

• Regional data hub – position a regional node in Budapest to consolidate cross-border data streams, enable continued investments in digital infrastructure, and accelerate investment in clean-energy procurement mechanisms. Use this hub to test scenarios, what‑if analyses, and normalization routines before scaling.

• Risk and feasibility management – identify olumsuz conditions (operational disruptions, data gaps, supplier nonperformance) and establish limit thresholds for automatic escalation. Prioritize feasible actions that can be executed in year one and iterated in later cycles without disrupting critical operations.

• Procurement and partnerships – align with partnerships and advisory teams to synchronize data-sharing agreements, ppas, and performance commitments. Document investment cases and ensure contracts specify data-rights, verification cadence, and dispute-resolution mechanisms.

• Operational positioning – frame the initiative as a visionary move toward a holistic improvement of facility performance, prioritizing contamination controls, energy-intense processes, and workforce readiness. Keep the community informed about progress and potential trade-offs, maintaining a transparent stance that strengthens trust beyond regulatory requirements.

• Feasibility and limits – conduct rapid pilots to test data-collection feasibility, sensor reliability, and integration with existing networks. Define clear limits for data latency, storage, and processing costs, and publish a concise plan of action for when thresholds are breached.

Concrete outputs should include a deployment roadmap, live dashboards with verified indicators, and an annual report pack that lays out their progress, lessons learned from Budapest tests, and next steps for expanding the data ecosystem. This approach ensures a stronger governance regime, a robust facility data ecosystem, and a verifiable trajectory toward cleaner, more efficient operations.